The Charlotte News

Friday, March 6, 1959

FOUR EDITORIALS

Site Ed. Note: The front page reports that the President this date had conferred with Congressional leaders on the Soviet threat to Berlin and possible Western counter-moves. He and British Prime Minister Harold Macmillan would begin talks in Washington on March 20 on the same critical problem. The White House and Mr. Macmillan's office in London had announced jointly that the British Prime Minister and Foreign Secretary Selwyn Lloyd would arrive in Washington on March 19 "for informal discussions lasting a few days on the international situation." The discussions would begin on March 20 and the talks would presumably include a review of Mr. Macmillan's recent conferences in Moscow with Soviet Premier Nikita Khrushchev. After the announcement of the plans of the Prime Minister, the President welcomed Senate and House leaders of both parties to his office for a discussion of the developing crisis. The group included Senate Majority Leader Lyndon Johnson, Senate Minority Leader Everett Dirksen, Speaker Sam Rayburn and House Republican leader Charles Halleck of Indiana. The President had also included Vice-President Nixon, Secretary of Defense Neil McElroy and Acting Secretary of State Christian Herter. According to reports which had reached officials in Washington since the talks by Prime Minister Macmillan with Premier Khrushchev, Mr. Macmillan would urge the President to reduce his conditions for a summit meeting with the Soviet Premier. The Prime Minister apparently was convinced that at present Mr. Khrushchev was determined to push his demands for withdrawal of the Western powers from Berlin and for a German peace treaty to a very dangerous extreme. White House press secretary James Hagerty said that the talks would cover "the evolving Berlin situation, the broader questions of Germany and, of course, Mr. Macmillan's visit to Moscow." Mr. Hagerty denied that the conference with Congressional leaders had been dictated by any sudden emergency.

Pioneer IV had vanished into space this date and might never be heard from again, after the space probe tracking station at Goldstone, Calif., had lost contact with it during the morning when the probe's transmitting signals had become very weak. At that time, the probe was traveling toward the sun at about 3,960 mph, 412,000 miles from earth. The Goldstone station had installed a special filter in its tracking gear and followed the space probe for an additional nine minutes. Asked if there was any likelihood of further contact with the craft, spokesmen for NASA said that it was unlikely, adding that since the probe's battery had apparently gone dead, it was unlikely that the Goldstone station would make any further search for it. They concluded that "Pioneer IV is gone forever." Earlier, the gold-plated cone had been sending clear signals from more than 400,000 miles out in space, picked up by Goldstone at 7:50 a.m. this date. Godspeed, Pioneer IV. When next we meet, it will be in heaven.

At Cherry Point, N.C., it was reported that eight Marines had died early this date when their R-4Q Flying Boxcar had crashed in a driving rainstorm, one crewman having survived. The large transport had been approaching the Marine Air Station on instruments in the wee hours of the morning when it crashed. The survivor, an acting sergeant from Connecticut, was taken to the naval hospital at nearby Camp Lejeune where he was listed in critical condition. The public information office said that the names of the dead would be released after notification of next of kin. The plane had been returning from Norfolk on a training flight and was making an approach on instruments when the tower lost contact with it. The plane struck a lowland area about 200 yards from a main highway. The office said that an investigation was underway to determine the cause of the crash. A 15-year old boy, who lived about a mile from the crash scene, said that he was awake getting a drink of water when he heard the plane approaching, making what he called an unusual sound, prompting him to step outside in time to see it pass over very low with red lights flashing all over it. Then he had heard the explosion when it hit. Residents of the area agreed that they had heard three explosions. The whole area had been lit up by the flashes and the fire, according to another witness who lived nearby. A civilian employee at Cherry Point had been one of the first to arrive at the scene, indicating that all of the bodies were inside the plane, except the injured man, who was on the ground. The plane, he said, was lodged in the tops of trees several feet off the ground and there was water around 6 inches deep below. The airbase was using helicopters to reach the scene and bulldozers had cleared a path to it.

At Fort Bragg, it was reported that General George C. Marshall, 78, was still in serious condition at Womack Army Hospital, where he had been since suffering a stroke on January 15, having suffered a second stroke on February 17.

In South Pittsburgh, Tenn., Highway Patrolmen from three states had converged on the tri-state border area this date after a desperate Alabama convict had abandoned a car in which he had held four persons hostage for more than 12 hours. The Tennessee Highway Patrol said that the car had been stolen by the man in his bid for freedom and was found on a rural road at the Tennessee River near the town. Officers believed that the man was on foot, and they said that at least 26 Tennessee, Alabama and Georgia Highway Patrol cars were in the area, a hilly farming and mining section. The man, serving 160 years in prison on six robbery convictions, had overpowered the patrolman and a trusty convict in a police car south of Birmingham on Thursday, using a key, which he had made himself, to unlock his handcuffs in the backseat of the car. The patrolman in the car said that he was in the front seat and had received a stranglehold from the prisoner who held a piece of steel against him and took his gun. Then the man ordered the trusty, a convicted killer serving 25 years, to drive to the home of the convict's sister in Birmingham, where the convict obtained a suit and $10, and then they had driven around for awhile until the convict spotted a car parked in front of a house, whereupon the three had gone inside the house and the convict had ordered a couple to go with them in their car, leaving the police car parked behind that house. The patrolman said that the entire time he had continued to try to talk the prisoner out of the escape, but was afraid of trying anything because of the kidnaped couple being in the car. The trusty had also sought to talk the prisoner out of the idea of escaping. From Birmingham, the man and his four hostages, held at gunpoint, had headed north. Near the town of Flat Rock, the prisoner ordered them to stop on the highway and told them to get out, after which the released hostages had walked to a farmhouse and telephoned police.

In Raleigh, a bill to expand the state's work release law had passed the State House this date, but had run into a delay after debate involving the budget for the Paroles Board. An objection to a third reading had held up the measure until the following week after it had passed its second reading by a wide margin on a voice vote. The measure would allow prisoners serving terms of up to five years to be considered for the work release plan, pursuant to which prisoners could serve their time at nights and on weekends while working at regular jobs. State Representative John Kerr of Warren County said that the bill would help rehabilitate prisoners and also would serve to keep down the prison population. Within five years, the prison population was expected to reach 13,000, according to the Representative. State Representative John McLaughlin of Iredell County, who delayed the bill when he objected to the third reading, had brought the Paroles Board budget into the debate, noting that under the bill, the Board would have authority to grant work release privileges in certain cases, adding that maybe it was the reason for part of the 31 percent increase for which the Board was asking. He favored leaving work release to the judges, which would not cost anything extra. State Representative I. C. Crawford of Buncombe County had first moved to suspend the rules to vote on the bill's third reading, despite Mr. McLaughlin's objections, and then had withdrawn his motion when debate threatened to boil over again. New bills introduced in largely routine House and Senate sessions, had included the Omnibus Bill appointing members of the county boards of education, sent forward in the House by State Representative John Hargett of Jones County, chairman of the House Education Committee.

Also in Raleigh, it was reported that sale of absentee ballots had brought an average of $100 the previous fall, according to Graham County Representative Leonard Lloyd. The Robbinsville lawyer said that vote buying was nothing new, that over the years it had become a worsening situation as Democrats and Republicans fought for control. But the prices, he said, had hit new levels and showed that things were out of hand. He favored that something be done about it and apparently the majority of his Graham constituents agreed, as they had elected him on his platform to sponsor legislation to abolish the civilian absentee ballot in that county. Mr. Lloyd said that he was talking only about the local situation in his county and that vote buying in Graham was strictly a bipartisan affair. He estimated that in the general election the previous fall, each side had spent in excess of $20,000 on county and state races, in a county with only about 7,000 people and 3,200 qualified voters. The State Board of Elections had recommended that the civilian absentee ballot be eliminated, the Board having blamed it as the source of most of the state's voting scandals. Despite the endorsement of Governor Hodges, the proposal had been greeted coolly by lawmakers. Richard Maxwell, executive secretary of the Elections Board, confirmed recently that the Board was having difficulty in finding a sponsor for the repeal bill.

Also in Raleigh, it was reported that a group of 30 female strikers from Henderson had arrived this date to see Governor Luther Hodges. A committee of six plus a minister had gone to see the Governor while the others waited in his reception room. They had presented the Governor with a statement in which they appealed to him to "step in personally as a participant" in joint union-management mediation sessions to settle the strife-marked strike at the Harriet-Henderson Cotton Mills. The women had told the Governor that "we are willing to present our case, too, and abide by the final and binding decision of any representative group you may see fit to appoint." A co-chairman of the delegation had told newsmen that they had come to Raleigh because they were interested in seeing that nothing was left undone to obtain a fair and amicable settlement, that they had received much unfair publicity and wanted to show that they were not "of the gangster, hoodlum, goon type" but just "hard-working, God-fearing people with children going to school and college." She pointed out that one member of the group was the mother of a 19-year old boy who had recently won a Morehead scholarship to UNC.

A March storm this date had spread into new territory with driving snow and splashing winds, dumping up to 1.5 feet of snow on eight Midwestern states, centered in Michigan during the morning. A squall which resembled a small tornado had ripped out a 60-foot section of wall at the Ford Motor Co. parts plant in Monroe, Mich., with none of the 250 workers hurt, as operations continued. A Greyhound bus had been stranded on U.S. 27, about 12 miles south of Cheboygan, Mich. A snowplow had been sent to the rescue, but conditions had been so bad that it had to turn back. Another Greyhound bus was reported marooned on State Road 68, between Indian River and Alanson, Mich. All schools in Cheboygan and surrounding counties had been closed. St. Ignace was virtually isolated. Iowa, which was staggering from the impact of the worst blizzard in a decade, was struggling to throw off its snowy straitjacket. Heavy snow and gusty northerly winds had created blizzard conditions in much of the storm belt. Temperatures remained in the 20's, however, and no severe cold was reported. The late winter storm, sweeping in from Colorado and Wyoming, had pounded wide areas of Nebraska, Iowa, Missouri, Wisconsin, Kansas, Oklahoma and Michigan, and was headed into sections of the Northeast. Heavy snow warnings had been posted for northern Michigan and for parts of Vermont and New Hampshire.

John L. Sherrill, in this date's edition of "Lenten Guideposts", indicates that in the book Operation Deepfreeze by Rear Admiral George Dufek, the author had written: "There have been so many times in my life when all my experience and all the resources at my command have been useless. At these times I've gone into my cabin and knelt before my bunk and prayed… Something always happened… I can't explain it and I don't intend to try." One such experience had begun for him on February 3, 1956, at his "Operation Deepfreeze" headquarters in Antarctica, receiving a radio dispatch that seven men were missing. Three years earlier, the Admiral had been assigned to the task of establishing year-round scientific bases in Antarctica. After two years of planning, he had started construction of two bases late in 1955, one on the coast at McMurdo Sound and one 450 miles along the coast to the east at Little America. A tractor train had set out from the latter base to scout a trail to the site of Byrd Base, 500 miles inland, to be built the following year. In the early morning hours of February 3, an "Otter", a single-engine plane especially adapted to cold-weather flying, piloted by a lieutenant, had departed from the tractor train on the Byrd Base trail to fly six passengers back to Little America. A few minutes later had come their last radio contact with the plane, that they were running into strong headwinds, freezing rain, with poor visibility, followed by silence. All of the Admiral's planes, except two short-range "Otters", had been flown out of the Antarctic for the winter and thus any search parties would have to operate out of Little America, 450 miles closer to the accident. The Admiral had radioed a captain at Little America to find out whether the "Otters" could be flown from McMurdo to Little America in the February gales, to which came the reply that nothing could be flown into McMurdo at present as the weather had closed in. The Admiral had radioed to let him know as soon as the weather lifted. He then asked about ground teams and the captain radioed the leader of the tractor train on the Byrd Base trail to retrace his track, as another tractor train set out from Little America to meet them. A day had already passed, when a faint distress signal had been picked up. On the second day after the crash there had been two more faint signals, but then again silence. The weather man at Little America still reported snow and high winds. In desperation, on the third day, the Admiral had decided to load one of the "Otters" on a ship and sail it to Little America. During that operation, a wing of the "Otter" had been smashed. It would take hours, perhaps a whole day, to repair it and the Admiral had decided to return to McMurdo and bring up the second "Otter". Meanwhile, the captain reported that the tractor trains had found no sign of the missing plane. The weather continued to be bad with white-out conditions. The Admiral said they would have to wait, but he had done more than just wait, returning to McMurdo and seeking a chaplain, who had been talking to base personnel in the chapel, built by those men during their own time, after they had put in their regular 12-hour shifts. The priest shared with the Protestant chaplain the southernmost parish in the world. The priest had asked whether there was any news and the response was that there was not, the priest then indicating that they would hold a special service after supper. The Admiral said he would be there. One of the men said that they wished there was something they could do, and the Admiral replied that there was, that they should pray and not be afraid to ask for help. The rest of the piece is on an inside page.

Beginning Monday, the newspaper would present a new radio-television page, designed to make viewing and listening more fun, including program logs for local and out-of-town television stations and local radio programs, previews of each evening's television programs, stories on television personalities and a TV question and answer column. Each day, the TV scout would preview the evening's top shows. Skilled reporters in Hollywood and New York, who viewed dress rehearsals and films and read scripts in advance, would tell the reader about the programs. The whole package would be presented in a more attractive and readable form than the previous listings, and would be titled "Sights and Sounds". Why can't we just read that and skip all the programming? What's the difference? Once you've seen one of these programs, you've seen them all. The rest is merely an addiction of your own contrivance. (Skeptics won't credit this, but we wrote those last sentences before watching this date's episode of Kookie and the Private Eye or having any idea that the episode aired this date. Maybe you can consult the Duke department of parapsychology, where the current 2026 UNC chancellor seems to hang. You made the wrong choice this date, fool, knocking down 73 years of Carolina tradition with your right-leaning, tainted filthy lucre. What transpired this date, the firing of coach Hubert Davis after a very successful season and four of five successful seasons, including 2024, was after we wrote that which follows below anent the possibility of a coaching change in the basketball program, advice which was not followed, unfortunately, for our alma mater and its coterie of money-grubbers now occupying the top echelons of the administration. We know who should be fired at present at UNC, and it is not, definitely not, anyone among the coaches, that is if you want to get the stink out of Chapel Hill, which is smelling to high, high heaven. We believe they used to call it Dooky. Now, we call it creeping Trumpism, same thing. Trump, no doubt, still holds a grudge for the 2017 national championship team voting not to go to the White House, for obvious and good reasons, and, so, as with so many of the vindictive little manchild's actions, seeks to insinuate himself to obtain revenge on the entire University community. Undoubtedly, this date's actions have engendered very warm feelings simultaneously among a subset of cretins over on the campus of Buck Duke's Trinity College, which we believe is another underlying reason for the firing, for coach Davis having spoiled the swan song of their coach back in '22, making sure of the matter in the semifinals, an unpardonable sin to some Dookies, no doubt, including, in all probability, the man who feigns having in mind the future of UNC as its new chancellor, the first non-academic ever to hold that position, a man riding a Trojan horse into Chapel Hill and who fain would have a new arena in a completely absurd location, while Duke Indoor remains where it has been since January 6, 1940, all to accommodate his money-bags backers, to replace the Dean E. Smith Center, only 41 years old, their insistent eagerness in the firing and the construction being a bit of a tell-tale heart. We warn that the next coach, whomever it will be, will be quite as accepted by many in the UNC community as a heart transplant from a noncompatible donor, with death of the entire program being likely to occur next season and beyond, at least until amends are made and resignations of the higher staff tendered and accepted, quite rightly. We provide that higher staff, tonight, with the Rockefeller salute. You and your money-bags do not have the right to trample our University into the ground, which is what you are doing, acceding to the wishes of the lowest common denominator, people who have never attended the school and people who are simply too young and naive to understand that there is more to sport than simply winning, in the long-run, and the short-run, something which Dean Smith taught well the student body when he was at the helm of the basketball program, something some of our friends in Durham and other places don't always get. We say that with the notion that we have many friends through life who are Duke graduates, and we do not allow the few who deviate from the norm of human understanding to pollute the standards set by others, any more than we do those relatively few UNC graduates who might, on occasion, deviate from the standards of the spirit and the poetry. But the carpetbagger who has been named chancellor by other carpetbaggers has got to go, along with his pals in the darkness, none of whom are UNC products and yet are bossing the institution and reshaping it to their own designs with big dollar signs in the forefront of all of their vaunted plans for "progress" in the name of regression.)

On the sports page the following day would be the story of the ACC Tournament semifinals in Raleigh this night, with Associated Press number 5 nationally UNC beating Duke, 74 to 71, and number 10 N.C. State beating Virginia, 66 to 63. N.C. State was not eligible for the NCAA Tournament because of having been placed on probation for improper recruitment of a player, meaning that UNC would automatically represent the conference in the NCAA Tournament, set to play Navy the following Tuesday night in New York. (In those days, each conference was limited to only one representative and the ACC determined that representative from its eight teams by its three-day tournament.) As indicated, it would lead to a controversial decision by UNC coach Frank McGuire on Saturday night, in an attempt to rest his starting lineup for the Navy game, essentially conceding the championship game to State, which UNC had beaten twice in the regular season but were stomped into the ground in the tournament finals, primarily because of coach McGuire's controversial decision. Again, we ask, should the coach of the undefeated 1957 national championship team have been fired for it? Based on current circumstances, where everyone seems to want to blame the coach for everything which goes wrong, including the season-ending injury of the team's top player, one bad game in the NCAA Tournament is enough to fire a coach with a 70 percent winning average. So, yes, by all means, fire coach McGuire next week, after UNC loses to Navy. That one was plainly his fault, without question. At least take away his Carolina blue Cadillac presented to him by appreciative alumni for winning the championship two years earlier. He is still a bum and bums must go, forthwith. Send the Caddy to the crusher.

We offer a suggestion to the UNC administration, again as an alumnus twice over and thus with some vested interest in a just, fair and proper outcome of the apparent dilemma, one which reflects the traditional Carolina spirit of fair-play and not one representing dollars and cents and cold-hearted results, which should not be the case regarding a coach who has won 70 percent of his games in his first five years, topping the rate established by Dean Smith between 1961 and 1966 and Mike Krzyzewski at Army between 1975 and 1980 or in his first five years at Duke, 1980 to 1985, also equaling the percentage of victories during the first five years of John Wooden at UCLA, between 1948 and 1953. In each case, coach Hubert Davis has also exceeded the efforts by each of those three coaches in the NCAA Tournament during his first five years.

We suggest that the UNC administration hold in an appropriate venue on campus a meeting, inviting, via the Daily Tar Heel and other area organs, the students, press, and interested people generally to come and listen initially to coach Davis and perhaps other prior coaches of UNC, including coach Roy Williams, coach Larry Brown, a former assistant at UNC under Dean Smith and former head coach of UCLA and the 1988 championship Kansas team, and any others, players and coaches, who might wish to participate, first to educate the present students to the realities of major college sports, realities which have not really changed that much, in truth, over the past 70 years or so, even if some of the rules have changed and some of the communications media have changed around the game, the object being to get the students and fans otherwise to realize that national championships and deep runs in the NCAA Tournament are not easy to produce, perhaps coming equipped with statistics from Jody Zogner as to how many of the top two seeds from each region actually have reached the Final Four since seedings began in the NCAA Tournament in 1980. Coach Davis, in 2022, entering the Tournament as a number 8 seed, beating then in the second round number 1 seeded and defending national champion Baylor despite the controversial call ejecting from the lineup Brady Manek for a supposed flagrant-2 techinical foul in the second half with Carolina holding a 25-point lead, nearly coached the team to the national championship, losing to Kansas in the closing moments of the championship game by three points. Since then, setting aside the following year, he has enjoyed good success, with a number 1 seed in 2024 and a very good team this year, finishing the regular season 24-7 and ranked in the top twenty nationally. And, most important, he has accumulated a 70 percent winning average over his first five years as a head coach. None of the possible candidates for succeeding coach Davis have any substantially better record. Thus, why, rationally, would the program wish to change? One can always imagine this or that outcome, but the imagining of it is not its realization.

We were sure, as certain as could be, in 1967, on the tenth anniversary of the national championship, that Carolina was headed into the semifinals against number 14 Dayton to brush them aside quickly and would be a formidable opponent for UCLA and Lewis Alcindor in the finals the following night. But, unfortunately, Don May of Dayton had other ideas and UNC lost in the semifinals by 14 points. We were sorely displeased and disappointed, sorely, sorely so, it having been the first NCAA semifinals game involving Carolina which we had experienced in wakefulness, having slept through the 1957 run, at a time before we understood much about the game. But, life continued and we simply set sail for the following season, with hope formed anew...

We are not in the situation in which the program found itself, floundering, in 2003, when coach Williams came in from Kansas. We recall, incidentally, sitting in the stands in Oakland at the first game of the 2004-05 season, watching UNC, ranked preseason number one, lose by 11 points to unranked and unheralded Santa Clara, an inauspicious start to the season, making for a rather doleful BART ride back to our home. Some spectators behind us who were chatty and friendly enough, said, "That Williams, he can't coach." We had to engage them a little and explain that he could, that they just had to be patient and they would see. They then asked about the prior coach, "Brad Daugherty", and it became clear that they did not follow closely UNC basketball. It was all jovial and polite, but they probably left thinking we were some kind of overly optimistic fool, placing blind faith in plainly a coach who simply couldn't do the job and, in consequence, would soon have to be fired.

But, we knew from past experience, such as in 1997—when coach Smith's team was at one point at the end of January, 12-6, and facing the potential of not even making the tournament, only to go on to win the rest of the games in the regular season, the ACC Tournament and get to the semifinals as a number 1 seed before losing to eventual national champion Arizona by eight points—, that the Carolina way, not the "Carolina brand", has a way of winning the same way the Irish do, not always pretty, but in the end, coming out on top of each morning. That is the Carolina spirit, the poetry of it. The Carolina "brand" is nothing but a cheap commercial trademark or two. That is not the essence of Carolina or its athletics. Perhaps, since this idea appears grossly misunderstood by the national media for the most part these days, engaged in pure commercialism, and obsessed with firing everyone, Trump-like, who fails to meet immediate subjective personal standards of what that individual deems "excellence", which seems to be "win at all costs", and the rest and the rights of all be damned, some gentle explanation to the student body and those around who wish to hear it might be in order, restoring a sense of what the Carolina spirit or poetry is all about, which we think has gradually eroded in this blogosphere, podcast, reality tv show, instant gratification era, taking to extremes adverse tendencies which have been present and growing in our society for quite a long time, since at least the end of World War II, ever continuing to ooze, blob-like, in a negative direction of consumption of the individual and the spirit of hope and poetry.

Hubert Davis embodies and understands quite well that Carolina spirit, we find, having played in it and coached in it, first as an assistant, and then, for the previous five seasons, as head coach. No one coming from the outside could possibly grasp it, not in a season or ten seasons. Indeed, it took Dean Smith at least five full seasons, and some might say, twenty, of humbling to begin to appreciate it. To dismiss coach Davis at this point would be a grave mistake for the future of Carolina basketball and its sports program generally, caving to the will of a lot of highly opinionated voices who do not seem to understand that Carolina spirit, have scarcely ever set foot on the "Magical Campus" as Thomas Wolfe called it, but favor instead a cut-and-dry, do-or-die, "now" mentality, all of whom, we find, have no banners of their own to fly. Yet, banners in the rafters, while impressive, are not the Carolina spirit or poetry of the matter either. That preceded all of the banners.

We hope that a good portion of the students still retain an appreciation for that spirit, that poetry, and are not being brainwashed by the national sports media and the scuttlebutt, which used to be only transmitted in private and by telephone, but which is now online in various forms, poisoning the well and throwing the baby out with the proverbial bathwater in practically every phase of life, carrying the potential to transform the Magical Campus into just another large plot of ground with a bunch of buildings on it—the way the non-poetic naysayers, those who lack appreciation for it, would like to see it, always have. That won't stop, as prating tongues are as old as the Scriptures. But communicating an understanding, a thoughtful understanding, a philosophical and objective understanding of the situation, the spirit and the poetry of the school, to a younger generation is always worthwhile.

So, we recommend such a forum for discussion soon, hopefully to clear the air and provide to all interested parties a sense of restored well-being and the realization that upsets in sports, as in life, are going to occur from time to time and we have to learn to roll on nevertheless, as life is never perfect and sport does not a substitute for life make. No team wins every year. No team ever has or ever will, as that becomes rather boring.

Hash it out. Respond to questions and comments and catcalls, if that be the case, from those gathered to hear. It could be an enlightening and groundbreaking experience for everyone involved.

We don't like the fact that underdog Virginia Commonwealth University came from 19 points down in the last 13 minutes of the game and from 13 points down in the last seven minutes to push the game into overtime, where they won. We cannot repeat here some of the language we were uttering in private at the tv last Thursday evening, wanting to throw something at the screen, though resisting the impulse as self-defeating. But that was not the fault of the players or the coaches; nor did we blame them for it in the aftermath. It was, as we have seen countless times since we first began following closely the sport in early 1963—when we saw guard Larry Brown expertly weave and dribble out the clock against Yale in Woollen Gymnasium, where FDR had once spoken in 1938 regarding his preference for scrambled eggs for breakfast, not grilled millionaire as his critics had suggested—, simply the bounce of the ball and the spirit of the game gone a little awry at the end, coupled with the will and determination of the opponent to accomplish the upset, not dissimilar to Carolina, a number 1 seed in 1994, losing to Boston College in the second round of the NCAA Tournament, a UNC team with championship potential, with the Final Four that year being held in Charlotte for the first time, a team which had won the national championship the prior year and had more talent on the roster in its top ten players than the previous year. It was then, again, sorely displeasing. But again, life went on, and despite one irate fan having written a letter to the Raleigh News & Observer, demanding in its aftermath the resignation or firing of Dean Smith as head coach. Had the internet and social media been available then for instant communication of erupting volcanic feelings online, the cascading tide of demands for his termination might have grown from one small ripple in a pond to a tidal wave, depriving the school of two more Final Four appearances in 1995 and 1997 before his retirement.

If a coach with a 70 percent winning average were subject to being fired for one game's result after a successful, albeit injury-ridden season, with injuries to starters in half the games, as in 2025-26, there would quickly be no coaches left in college basketball. And no one would want to coach for such a program in any event, at least no one competent. That cannot become the case at UNC, if there is anything to be hoped for next season and the seasons thereafter, the hope for which is always the Carolina way, the spirit and the poetry. So hash it out and have a long public discussion before making a serious mistake which cannot be easily ever undone, ruinous, we trow, of the basketball program for years, perhaps decades, to come. Trying desperately to support the "Carolina brand", in some commercial scheme, is a fool's errand. Stick with the spirit, the poetry—in this the 250th year since the Declaration of Independence was signed in Philadelphia, a mere 17 years before the First State University laid its cornerstone on October 12, opening its doors to one Hinton James, a student who had to walk from Wilmington in the dead of winter to attend his first classes in February, 1795. We talked to him one brisk January afternoon in 1973 while walking through McCorkle Place, and he explained a lot of things to us, about the spirit and the poetry.

On the editorial page, "Fine Arts Drive Deserves Wide Support" finds that the experiment in mass support for Charlotte's leading cultural activities had begun and must not fail. The point of no return had been passed the previous afternoon when a date had been announced for the opening of the community's first Fine Arts Fund drive, on Monday, March 16, with Charles Conner serving as general chairman.

Federated fund-raising for health, welfare and recreation agencies was not new, having begun with Cleveland's first Community Chest in 1913. But only in recent years had the same general philosophy been adapted to the special needs of culture, with the most proximal successful example being in Winston-Salem with its fine arts fund.

It indicates that an arts fund lacked the immediate appeal of charity and a part of the job of the local fund would be to educate the populace. Large numbers of people would have to be taught the value of a healthy cultural life in Charlotte.

It finds that even at present, the creative and dynamic elements of Charlotte's culture were generating values which might make it possible to offer opportunities for greater self-fulfillment and a richer life for the whole population. Given a sounder economic base, the city's cultural organizations could contribute more to the general well-being of the community. It indicates that there had been a time when good music, good drama and good art had been the private province of the elite, but that those days had passed and at present, culture was the birthright of any claimant.

One of the aims of the arts fund was to make it possible for the extension of serious cultural values to increasingly large numbers of people. By broadening the base of support for the arts, the fund would also be broadening the base of appreciation and enjoyment. The united appeal for cultural activities also had the value that each organization would not have to conduct its own independent campaign at various times of the year, thus not bothering contributors repeatedly for separate contributions. The arts fund would bring the same sort of unity of purpose and application to the cultural scene which the United Appeal had brought to charitable solicitations for local health, welfare and recreation.

The Charlotte Choral Society, the Charlotte Opera Association, the Charlotte Symphony Orchestra, the Oratorio Singers, the Mint Museum of Art, the Symphonette, the Children's Nature Museum and the Mecklenburg Historical Association would all be subject to one effort at contribution. The fund-raising effort also had the active support of nine sponsoring members who would not share in the contributions, the Little Theater, the Children's Theater, the Charlotte Chapter of the American Guild of Organists, the Community Concerts Association, Queens and Davidson Colleges, the Charlotte Music Club and the Guild of Charlotte Artists.

It finds it a bold adventure in fund-raising, but a worthy one deserving of the community's full support.

"Cheers for the Chamber of Commerce" indicates that before the memory of the General Assembly's visit on Wednesday to Charlotte to hold a meeting would fade, the Chamber of Commerce ought be awarded a round of applause. It finds that from idea to execution, the whole operation had been a success. The task had been gargantuan, involving the moving of the Governor and his staff, the State Senate and the State House, plus key State officials from Raleigh to Charlotte. With Col. Paul Younts in the role of field marshal to direct the operation, it had been done with amazing ease and precision.

The legislators had arrived in a slightly suspicious frame of mind, but had not been subjected to special pleadings of any kind. They had liked what they had seen and most of the legislators appeared to have left with a better appreciation of Charlotte's character and outlook. There would be no direct benefits, but expresses the feeling that the long-term gains in terms of understanding and goodwill would be considerable.

"A Type of Protest" indicates that as middle age approached, it came to mind that people did not do things the way they had done them a few years earlier. Office doors were much harder to open and it was easier to steer a Model A Ford than the modern cars. It also finds that there were longer sidewalks around, along which to try to run to catch a bus.

Even publishers, it finds, would not cooperate as they were publishing books and magazines in the smallest type available, trying to jam in more words. It was also eye-straining, "and one of these first days we're going to raise cain with somebody." (The latter paragraph is deliberately placed in an eye-straining font—and we have strained our eyes to read it so that you do not have to. But you do not have to thank us.)

"New York Sweepers Try the Hard Sell" indicates that when New York had decided to do something, it did not spare publicity, its latest effort being a cleanup offensive spearheaded by a department of sanitation task force. A street sweeper festooned with garlands had moved into Times Square accompanied by two models in shorts and sweaters riding shotgun, with Mayor Robert Wagner on hand with a broad smile for photographers.

But then confusion had descended as photographers sought pictures of the models handing flowers to people kind enough to drop their trash into City receptacles. At first, the volunteers would not wait and City employees had rushed ahead, offering free paper for people to hold if they would just pose with the girls. Having rigged the scene, the line of march had broken down as cameramen had taken up five minutes at each stop, and the stalled parade had caused quite a traffic jam which had taken superior police work to untangle.

It suggests that there was a lesson to be learned for Charlotte residents, that besides keeping a tidy city for the sake of cleanliness, they would hate to be subjected to a last-ditch publicity campaign on trash. It regards it also as self-preservation, indicating that if it ever saw a flower-bedecked street sweeper descending on it with models, it would probably be stunned and stop cold in the middle of the street.

"With our luck we'd be run down and neatly scrubbed into the monster's dustbin. And if there's any place we have no desire to visit, it's the digestive tract of a monster, festooned with garlands or not."

A piece from the New York Times, titled "Baseball in the Congo", indicates that a young American consul from Massachusetts had managed to establish a six-club baseball league at Brazzaville in the new Congo Republic. There were no gloves or masks and the ball was made of soft rubber. But the bats, turned from a local wood, had been splendid.

The boys in the Congo were just beginning to learn about baseball, but loved to bat. Their idol was Ernie Banks of the Chicago Cubs, since he was the man who had hit the "grande frappe", or home run. The boys had heard all about him, but had never seen his picture. The consul explained that he had tried to obtain pictures to prove to the boys that Mr. Banks was real, but that thus far his requests had gone unanswered.

It suggests that perhaps he had not sent the request to the right place and so it would make requests for him, first sending one to the management of the Cubs and second, to the president of the National League, third, to any good fans who happened to have a spare picture around. It provides the address of the consul.

It indicates that it might be a good idea, while about it, to send some pictures of some other great black stars to prove that, while there was only one Ernie Banks, he had some competition. Some 16mm movies might also be included. The State Department, which had good experience in the use of athletes to provide international understanding, could possibly consider the idea of sending Mr. Banks on a "diplomatic" mission to the Congo when the season was over.

Drew Pearson indicates that there was an ironic twist of fate in that the person who would replace the chief enemy of nepotism in Congress was presently one of the chief beneficiaries of nepotism in Congress, that being Senator Albert Gore of Tennessee, a Democratic hopeful for the presidency. When Mr. Gore had first come to Washington 20 years earlier, he had succeeded to the House vacancy left by Congressman John Ridley Mitchell of Tennessee, who had waged an unrelenting campaign against putting relatives on the public payroll.

In 1952, Congressman Gore had been elected to the Senate. The relatives of Senator Gore were not published, first because the Senate payroll remained secret and also because Senator Gore had placed some of his relatives in jobs outside Congress. To unearth Senatorial relatives, the Associated Press had been asking Senators for the names of wives, children, brothers, cousins and aunts whom they appointed to public office, thus far producing more indignation than information.

Though he did not publicize it, Senator Gore held the unofficial record for Senate nepotism, probably having taken care of more relatives at taxpayer expense than anyone else in the Senate, possibly more than anyone in Congress. Mr. Pearson lists the relatives of the Senator on the public payroll, which included his sister, who worked for the Federal Trade Commission, a niece who was on the Senator's office payroll, a nephew, who worked in the Senate post office, another sister, who also worked in the Senate post office, and the Senator's 20-year old daughter who was a guide the previous year at the U.S. pavilion at the Brussels World's Fair. The latter had saved enough money, primarily from her earnings, to come home by way of Poland, Greece, Turkey, Pakistan, Hong Kong, Japan and Hawaii. (Only in response to some of the ubiquitous trollers, who seek through their comments below the above-linked video, to profane a man's heart-felt expression of family memories, we are compelled, by the notion of providing a "fair and balanced" portrait, to note that there has scarcely been any family in U.S. history with more nepotism in play than the Bush and Trump families. You might want, little troller, to include that in your attempted exposition of hypocrisy, a charge of which all humans are susceptible to some degree, not thereby, however, necessarily being excused from the grossest forms of it, as in the stealing of an election to perpetuate one's paternal legacy with junior. Sorry, but the truth may sting a bit, before the shot heals the disease.)

Bolivian riots against Americans inspired by Time Magazine would make it extremely difficult for Clare Boothe Luce, wife of the publisher of Time, Henry Luce, to serve effectively in her new post as U.S. Ambassador to Brazil. The reason was that the Luce family had been so closely tied to the Eisenhower Administration that when Time suggested that Bolivia be carved up among its neighbors, the idea was interpreted as having the support of the President. It had been Time's report that U.S. authorities believed Bolivia ought be divided up between its neighbors which had incited Bolivian mobs to stone the U.S. Embassy and U.S. Information Center in La Paz, causing Americans to be evacuated to an Army camp outside the city. If Mrs. Luce were to take her post as Ambassador to Brazil, it would be a source of continued resentment to Bolivians, as Brazil had a long border adjacent to Bolivia and the low lands of Bolivia had more unity, economically and geographically, with Brazil than with the 12,000-foot plateau of Bolivia.

Joseph Alsop tells of two impressions which had stood out among the many he had gleaned during his visit to the Strategic Air Command. He indicates that anyone who visited SAC was bound to be impressed by the magnificence of the great force, but that any reasonably sharp-eyed visitor was also bound to be struck by the risks which the national policymakers had been smugly taking in recent years.

Another report had described the greatest and most inexcusable of those risks to be the failure to mount an airborne alert of SAC while there was no warning of a potential Soviet missile strike. He finds it surprising that the quality of SAC had not already been impaired, as quality usually suffered when a force was simultaneously burdened with an almost unbearable responsibility and also denied the means for carrying out that responsibility with the fullest assurance of success. He finds that the moment when SAC's responsibility had become all but unbearable had been in the late autumn of 1958 when the Administration had decided that a balanced defense would cost too much. "The new look" which was then taken, the subsequent reliance on "a bigger bang for a buck", had really entailed concentrating most of the burden of safeguarding the country and the free world on SAC's shoulders. The degree of concentration had been revealed by a single statistic, that 90 percent of the nation's nuclear weapons had been assigned to SAC.

It might therefore be supposed that no pains or expense would have been spared to maintain SAC in the highest possible condition of immediate readiness. But any such supposition was incorrect. There were a number of remediable deficiencies within the force which had been allowed to arise because the remedies would cost money. They began at the large, theoretically bombproof underground command post of SAC, built when the power of hydrogen bombs had already been well-known. But the plans had been prepared in the atomic bomb era. Former Defense Secretary Charles E. Wilson would not approve the extra expense to provide hardness for the facility against hydrogen bombs. Thus the brains of SAC were presently contained in an allegedly bombproof shelter which was not proof against the only kind of bomb which was likely ever to be dropped on it.

Even more important was the problem of the B-47's, those medium-range jet bombers still constituting more than two-thirds of the SAC force, some having been replaced with B-52's and more to be in the future. In 1960-61, a couple of squadrons of B-47's would also switch to the new B-58 jet bomber. But during the entire time of the missile gap, at least half of SAC's aircraft would continue to be B-47's, which had been designed to operate from overseas bases, now neutralized by the new Soviet capability in MRBM's. B-47 operations from bases on the U.S. side of the Atlantic were also crippled at present by their dependence on the slow and obsolete KC-97 tanker for refueling the B-47's. The latter could, in theory, reach their targets with that refueling but could not use the complex fuel-consuming tactics which would give them the best chance of penetrating enemy defenses and getting away again. Thus, dependence on the KC-97's had greatly increased the danger for the crews and had reduced their chances of success.

The new jet tanker, the KC-135, would almost completely overcome the B-47's difficulties, and the Pentagon needed only to provide an order to double the current KC-135 production, but had not done so.

He indicates that the examples cited were not exceptional but were typical. "They do not necessarily mean, thank God, that SAC cannot perform its assigned task. But they most certainly mean that the administration has not done everything possible to ensure the fullest effectiveness of the great deterrent on which all American policy depends. Even today, when our danger is so apparent, everything possible is still not being done. A clearer proof of penny wisdom and pound foolishness could hardly be imagined."

Doris Fleeson indicates that the Pentagon had accepted the immediate departure of Secretary of Defense Neil McElroy as a fact and understood that Deputy Secretary Donald Quarles would succeed him. She indicates that the latter was the obvious choice as successor because the time remaining in the Administration was about equal to the time it would take a newcomer to master the job.

But Mr. Quarles was not popular with the services and lacked prestige with Congress. Congress, however, would not complain because he had been the man promoted to the position of obvious successor to Mr. McElroy.

She finds the situation analogous to that at the State Department, where the word was that should Secretary Dulles not return to his desk after his cancer radiation treatments, Acting Secretary Christian Herter would take over. Again, Senators wished the replacement were a stronger one but they saw no alternative.

Mr. McElroy was under heavy criticism for planning to leave his post during the time of great danger. It was made worse by the fact that he was pleading as the reason the threatened loss of personal financial benefits from his firm, Proctor & Gamble.

Military circles were suggesting that Senate Majority Leader Lyndon Johnson, in his capacity as chairman of the Space Committee, had succeeded in getting from the service chiefs testimony which contradicted Mr. McElroy's defense of the President's military budget cuts. Thus, in any military troubles arising from the Berlin situation, Mr. McElroy would be cast as the goat. The position was reminiscent of former Defense Secretary Louis Johnson's role during the Korean War crisis, when the Pentagon economics had suddenly become criminal. Then-President Truman had proposed those cuts and then-Army chief of staff, General Eisenhower, had seconded them, and Congress had cheered. But it had been the end of the tenure of Mr. Johnson.

She suggests that it might appear curious to Mr. McElroy who, despite prior lack of Government experience, had been brought into the Pentagon with fanfare which had included a Presidential boomlet. Mr. McElroy stated that the President had agreed that he might serve for only a limited time, standing as a monument to the Eisenhower optimism and his apparently unquenchable faith that a man who could make money could accomplish miracles in public service as well. Yet, the President could plead that the voters had re-elected him in 1956 after four years of observing his operations and after his own statement that his health would not permit him to be as active as he formerly had been.

What had finally appeared was that once again, a dramatic situation showed how the American system made government the prisoner of the calendar. The Democratic sweep in the previous November midterm elections had, in effect, been a repudiation of the President's leadership and yet he had to stay and make the best of things for the remainder of his final term.

It would be hard enough, in any case, as every Administration started to deteriorate within its final two years in office, when its first team tired or felt it had earned a safe harbor in private life. Its replacements had short tenure and many headaches to which to look forward while the press and public were already looking ahead to the successors.

What was new at present was the nature of the danger and, she indicates, that was no longer very new, either.

A letter writer finds the visit to Charlotte by the legislators and other State officials to have been a good excuse for the "country folks" to come to town to see the Ringling Brothers, Barnum and Bailey Circus. He thinks that as long as they could derive the benefit of their facilities, they might take the whole of the state into Charlotte's perimeter areas so that they could assume their share of Charlotte's obligations. He adds that Mayor Jim Smith and former Mayor Philip Van Every might then, however, have to move their factories to South Carolina.

A letter writer from Chicago encloses a circular being distributed in Chicago—which the editors note referred to a Catholic publication, noting that North Carolina "is still the least Catholic area in the world," and referred to the state as "the China of America", telling of recent progress in the "process of evangelization." The letter writer indicates that the unfortunate expatriates from Virginia, as himself, had known all along about North Carolinians but did not tell the rest of the world, especially the Yankees, about it, but word had seemed to get out nevertheless. He says that under the splendid Governor Luther Hodges, the state was making material progress, "but there is nothing else for you to do to redeem yourselves except to either turn Catholic or just study hard and imitate Virginians."

A letter writer indicates that the City Board of Education, at its regular meeting on February 10, by unanimous approval, had passed a resolution expressing appreciation to the newspaper for the favorable approach which had been given to education during the previous year regarding the City Schools and commends the newspaper for its active participation in the educational growth of the children and young people of the community.

A letter writer from Springfield, Mass., indicates that spiritual leaders ought take a more active interest in the prevention and settlement of disputes between employers and workers. "As ambassadors of Christ, the Prince of Peace, the prevention of strife in the community, as well as in the nation and between nations, should interest them deeply." He urges that before a work stoppage would occur, a public meeting ought be held at which representatives of both sides would explain to the people of the community why they could not reach an agreement, giving public officials, civic leaders, clergymen and others the opportunity to exert their influence and point out ways to settle the dispute amicably and justly.

Framed Edition
[Return to Links
Page by Subject] [Return to Links-Page by Date] [Return to News<i><i><i>—</i></i></i>Framed Edition]
Links-Date Links-Subj.