![]()
The Charlotte News
Thursday, June 25, 1959
FIVE EDITORIALS
![]()
![]()
Site Ed. Note: The front page reports from Montréal that the President, who shunned the presidential yacht, would board Queen Elizabeth's plush Britannia on Friday and cruise with her along 31 miles of the St. Lawrence Seaway, the meeting to open formally the Seaway, the joint U.S.-Canadian project which could bring three-fourths of the world's ships to the heartland of America. A cruise aboard the 6 million dollar royal yacht would take them to Beauharnois, Québec, from the Seaway entrance at St. Lambert and they would then go through the first two in a series of locks, the liquid stairways which lifted shipping 224 feet from the St. Lawrence River into Lake Ontario. Seaway authorities were still ironing out kinks, but two months of operation had proved the system worked. More than 1,500 ships had used the waterway since its opening on April 25. On Friday, in less than 12 hours, the President would fly, walk, motor and sail about 1,000 miles. Flying from Washington, he would land in his plane, Columbine III, at the St. Hubert Air Base, 8 miles east of Montréal, a unit of the North American Air Defense network which maintained contact 24 hours each day with NORAD headquarters in Colorado Springs, Colo. About 17,000 persons, some of whom were Americans, worked at St. Hubert. The Queen would meet the President at that location. Even during the royal greetings, groups of pilots would be in the ready-room, set to take off in CF-100 jet interceptors should the Northern radar stations signal an attack.
In Lincoln, Neb., it was reported that convicted murderer Charles Starkweather had been electrocuted this date, facing the electric chair "calm and self-controlled to the end". An ironic hitch had marked the execution when the prison physician, who was to have pronounced Mr. Starkweather dead, had suffered a heart attack and himself died. The 75-year old physician had been stricken only a half-hour before the midnight execution and alternates had carried out the act. The execution had taken place at 12:05 a.m., CST, in the white-painted basement execution chamber at the Nebraska State Penitentiary. The 20-year old convicted killer had no last words. At a minute past midnight, he had walked unassisted into the chamber, glanced at some 35 assembled witnesses, managed a kind of smile and ambled up to the bulky, wooden execution chair. His head had been shaved of its red hair and a trouser leg had been cut off to accommodate the electrical contacts. A curtain had been drawn in front of the witnesses as the condemned was strapped to the chair. The curtain opened and a half-mask covered Mr. Starkweather's face. The deputy warden had asked him whether he had anything he would like to say and he shook his head negatively. An eye mask was then affixed over his eyes and the executioner, out of sight behind a partition, received the signal and 2,200 volts had coursed through Mr. Starkweather's body, which strained against the bonds of the chair. The execution followed a day of frantic effort by Mr. Starkweather's family and Washington attorneys on his behalf to seek another stay of the execution, five previous dates having come and gone because of court stays. With all hope gone, Mr. Starkweather's mother and other family members had made a final call on the condemned, and then left by a side gate to escape some 25 newsmen and photographers milling about the main entrance. Guy Starkweather, the father, who had handled the last-ditch efforts on behalf of his son to obtain stays through habeas corpus petitions all the way to the Supreme Court, had said he was "busy with work" and did not go to the prison, not explaining what he meant. The petitions, exhausted, when the Supreme Court on Monday had declined to hear a petition for writ of certiorari, had claimed that his trial had been unfair on the basis of certain admitted evidence and primarily ineffective assistance of counsel under the Sixth Amendment because his two court-appointed attorneys had entered a plea on his behalf, against his will, of not guilty by reason of insanity, presenting the testimony of psychiatrists and presenting his various confessions to the 11 murders. The courts had found that the choice by the attorneys was tactical and strategic in nature and thus did not amount to ineffective assistance. The 11 murders to which he confessed had begun with the killing of a young service station attendant, a student at the University of Nebraska, on December 1, 1957, because the attendant would not extend credit to Mr. Starkweather so that he could purchase a stuffed animal for his girlfriend, Caril Ann Fugate. The remainder of the murders had occurred in late January, 1958, starting with the stepfather, mother and baby half-sister of Ms. Fugate, then 14, and then continuing to a farm outside Lincoln, where Mr. Starkweather knew the elderly farmer, killing him and then consuming his food and staying overnight at the farmhouse. After Mr. Starkweather's old Ford had gotten stuck in mud, the two began hitchhiking and 17-year old Robert Jensen and his 16-year old girlfriend, Carol King, happened along and stopped to pick them up as a friendly gesture. Both wound up being held at gunpoint and forced into an abandoned storm cellar, where Mr. Starkweather then shot both to death, with Ms. Fugate allegedly aiding and abetting the murders by maintaining a shotgun on the two as they rode along. In a separate trial, delayed because of appeals through the courts seeking to get her tried as a juvenile rather than as an adult, as sought by the prosecution, she had been convicted of Mr. Jensen's murder also, as had been Mr. Starkweather, and was sentenced to life imprisonment, the prosecution not having sought the death penalty in her case. Mr. Starkweather, because of the sentence of death, was never prosecuted on any of the other murders, though, to bolster his insanity defense, his attorneys had introduced his various and sometimes inconsistent confessions to all 11 killings. He had, at times, sought to exonerate Ms. Fugate, while at other times implicating her, for instance, contending that she had fatally stabbed the wife of a well-to-do businessman in Lincoln, whose house the two had taken over on the day following the three murders outside of Lincoln, those of the farmer and the young couple. All three members of that household, the husband, the wife, and their deaf maid, were found murdered. The last victim had been in Wyoming, a traveling salesman who was asleep in his car when Mr. Starkweather and his girlfriend had driven up in the stolen Packard from the well-to-do family, and Mr. Starkweather then killed the salesman in an effort to steal his car. As Mr. Starkweather tried to get the emergency brake released on the salesman's car, another good samaritan stopped alongside the road and offered help, at which point Mr. Starkweather told him that if he did not help him release the emergency brake, he would "blow his goddamned head off", whereupon the man, seeing the sawed-off shotgun in the car being wielded by Mr. Starkweather, began wrestling to get the gun away from him, was able to do so and avoid injury. At that point, Ms. Fugate surrendered to an arriving patrolman, as Mr. Starkweather took off in the Packard, eventually caught after a chase at high speeds over several miles. He had finally surrendered when a bullet from the pursuing officers had punctured the rear window of the car, causing flying glass to lacerate his right earlobe, the resulting blood flow causing him to believe that he was seriously wounded. Before the execution, according to the deputy warden, Mr. Starkweather had spurned a final steak dinner and settled instead for some cold cuts. He had done some painting, some reading and had visited with the prison chaplain as the end had neared. Ms. Fugate would eventually be paroled in 1976 after serving 18 years in prison, and is still alive. She has consistently maintained that she never participated in the killings in late January and was not a willing participant in the rampage of "Chuck", but had been coerced by him to accompany him, that he had hidden behind the door to her home after, unknown to her at the time, killing her step-father, mother and baby sister and hiding their bodies in a shed in the backyard while she was at school, and had accosted her and told her when she arrived home that some unidentified third party had taken her family members and would kill them unless she did whatever he told her. She claimed that until she was told after her surrender and arrest in Wyoming that her three family members were dead, she still believed that he had been telling her the truth and so followed his directions and never sought to escape despite numerous opportunities to do so, on fear that her family members would be killed. Prosecutors found her story flawed on the basis, in part, of the widespread publicity attracted to the homicides and the headlines on the front page of the Lincoln Star which told of the bodies of her family members being found, at a time when the two had returned to Lincoln and spent the night in the car before entering the home of the well-to-do couple, where they had watched television for a time.
In Newark, N.Y., it was reported that a nine-month old boy had been found dead at the base of a lamp, apparently having touched an exposed electrical cord and been electrocuted, according to the coroner the previous day.
In Duluth, Minn., it was reported that a semi-trailer grain truck had gone out of control down a hill without brakes and hit a car and smashed into two homes on Wednesday night, with three persons having been killed and four others injured. The impact had caused the truck's heavy load of grain to pass through the wall of the first house and into another, around the corner. Two of the seriously injured had been a couple watching television in their living room when the truck smashed into the front of their home and the other two had been a couple injured in the other home when an oil drum from the truck had entered the home and rolled into the couple.
In Spoleto, Italy, it was reported
that Louis Armstrong, one of the top ranking jazz men for his trumpet
playing, lay gravely ill in a coma the previous night. Italian
doctors said that the musician had suffered heart disturbances which
seriously complicated an attack of pneumonia, from which he had
become ill on Tuesday. His American physician, who had accompanied
him to the central Italian town for a musical festival, insisted,
almost tearfully: "He never had any kind of heart attack. He
just blew himself out, that's all. Any musician who blows on a wind
instrument for years suffers some weakening of the heart. That's
inevitable." "Satchmo", as he was affectionately
called, had been making music on his horn since the birth of jazz. In
dramatic evidence of his rise from the old Tin Pan Alley days of New
Orleans music, he lay ill in a town dedicated to Italian classic
opera. Mr. Armstrong would fully recover
In Mexico City, it was reported that recovery of the last three missing buses, the property of Carolina Scenic Trailways of Spartanburg, S.C., was expected soon according to the U.S. Embassy. The Embassy declared on Wednesday that two of the buses already had been recovered and they were certain to recover the third bus shortly. The location of the third bus had not been revealed to facilitate its recovery, according to officials. The president of Carolina Scenic Trailways had sent the three buses to Laredo, Tex., for sale to Mexican interests. The potential buyer had made a $4,200 down payment and promised the $91,990 balance after testing the air-conditioning of the buses. He said that the buyer had driven the buses into Mexico on May 24 and had not returned. He had appealed to Senator Strom Thurmond of South Carolina, who had notified the State Department and Ambassador Robert Hill. The Embassy said that return of all of the buses would be demanded under the stolen car convention between the U.S. and Mexico. It revealed that one of the buses had been found in Ciudad Miguel Aleman in the state of Veracruz. The district attorney in Laredo said during the morning that the grand jury had taken no action on presentments to the grand jury in connection with the case and said that he could make no comment on Jack Love of Charlotte in connection with the matter. One of the bus company's attorneys said that he could make no comment about Mr. Love in connection with the missing buses, indicating that Mr. Love had not been acting for them in any capacity and was not their agent "in any sense of the word".
Ann Sawyer of The News, in the fourth in a series of articles on consolidation of the City and County School Systems, indicates that many people and organizations viewed it as the salvation for the community's schools. Among those on record as favoring consolidation of the two systems were the City and County School Boards, the superintendents of both systems, the Chamber of Commerce, the 32 white PTA's in the County system, the League of Women Voters, and the executive committee of the Charlotte PTA Council. The League of Women Voters for years had taken the position that schools ought be consolidated and when the consolidation discussion had resumed two years earlier, the League had issued a statement reaffirming that position. One of the League's leaders was Mrs. Oliver Rowe, wife of the man later to take the lead in working for consolidation. In a statement prepared by Mrs. Rowe, Mrs. Elmer Rouzer and Mrs. Paul Hansell, the League in March, 1957 had said it "wholeheartedly" supported the issue, that it would be worth the effort involved, the small personal dissatisfactions entailed, and the initial cost to the community's purses, to be able to feel that in Mecklenburg County as a whole, each student had obtained that ideal toward which they all had been striving, equal opportunity for children of the whole area. The Chamber of Commerce committee had followed suit in April, 1957, and had a report ready the following January 13. At a meeting of Chamber members, school boards, City and County PTA groups and the League, the report officially had been presented and was approved by the Chamber's executive committee. The report said that action ought begin immediately toward possible consolidation by the beginning of the 1959-60 school year. At that meeting, some City School Board members had approved, but most County School Board members had taken a dim view of consolidation anytime soon. Members of the study committee are listed. A few days after the meeting, the City superintendent, Dr. E. H. Garinger, had read a letter to the City Board from Chamber president Thomas L. Robinson, then-publisher of The News, asking the Board to take the necessary steps for consolidation. On the night of February 6, Mr. Rowe had made a noteworthy speech in favor of consolidation.
Ms. Sawyer also reports that extension of Charlotte's water system to the perimeter area to be annexed to the City on January 1, would cost a little more than a million dollars. Bids had been received the previous day at City Hall and would be presented to the City Council on Monday. The water superintendent had said that he would recommend contracts be awarded to Boyd & Goforth, Inc., for two sections of the work, and to Blythe Bros. Co., for the other two sections. To get all of the work in the perimeter area started at the same time, as well as to give small companies an opportunity to bid for the job, the perimeter area had been divided into four sections. Boyd & Goforth had been the low bid on the Wilkinson Boulevard and Providence Road-Sardis Road areas, with bids having been $237,358 and $303,524 respectively. Blythe Bros. had been the low bid for the Hoskins-Thomasboro and Park Road-Selwyn Avenue areas, with bids having been $269,387 and $217,872 respectively. The total base bids were $1,028,143. The work would bring minimum fire protection to the area as well as supply domestic water. Bids for extending the city sanitation sewer system in the perimeter area were to be opened on July 16. That job, also expected to cost more than a million dollars, was being handled by the City Engineering Department, involving about 490,000 feet of pipe. The 37 square-mile perimeter area had been divided into three geographic areas for the sewer work.
Vehicular traffic along Tryon Street, it was announced, might be slower moving in the ensuing 60 to 90 days while Piedmont Natural Gas Company installed new pipelines.
John Kilgo of The News reports that over 400 Charlotte motorists had already felt the State's new traffic "point system" after the new plan had gone into effect the previous Friday. Through the previous night, the points were piling up in a hurry. If a motorist received 12 points within a 24-month period, their driver's license would be suspended for 60 days. Charlotte police had given out 201 speeding ticket since the prior Friday, resulting in two points for each such motorist, and if their speed had been more than 55 mph, three points. Since the new system had gone into effect, 67 residents of Charlotte had been given citations for running red lights, a three-point violation. Thirty-four had been cited for running stop signs, worth two points, and 22 had been cited for failing to yield the right-of-way, a three-point violation. The captain of traffic said that he thought the new point system would have a tremendous impact on the driving public, that when a person accumulated three points, they would begin to think harder before breaking the law again. He believed that it would cut down on moving violations.
Julian Scheer of The News
reports on lightning bugs, indicating that it was really a firefly,
both being slang expressions for a night-loving beetle of the
Elteridae and Cantharidae families. There were 90 species of them and
he had not had a chance to find out to which the local lightning bug
belonged. He had determined that the luminous organs of the bug's
body lit up a specialized portion of the fat-body of the beetle. The
female had more light in her body than the male. The function of the
flashing was, according to the experts, probably to facilitate the
meeting of the sexes. One bug was apparently saying to the other,
"Hiya, buggy." Even the eggs would give off a light.
Ladies in Cuba and Mexico used lightning bugs or fireflies to
decorate their hats and dresses and some people in tropical South
America had used them as light. He suggests that a half-light was
better than none in that latter application. Lightning bugs were only
found in warm climates. Eskimos knew nothing of them, but African
natives knew nothing of the Northern Lights, making things even.
"And, kiddies, if you think you've got something special in your
backyard at night, you ain't seen nothin'. The kids in Paraguay have
a lightning bug called a railroad beetle. The bug lights up red on
the end and green on the sides. So there, too." If you see one of those
Max Muhleman of The News, the newspaper's boxing writer, would be at ringside in Yankee Stadium this night when Floyd Patterson would risk his heavyweight championship against Sweden's Ingemar Johansson. Mr. Muhleman would interview both fighters after the bout and provide the inside story on the sports pages of the newspaper the following day. His coverage of the pre-fight picture continued in this date's sports pages in an interview with Charley Norcus, who had been fired by Mr. Johansson's sparring partner after he hit the challenger too hard during a workout. Mr. Norcus told why Mr. Patterson would win the fight.
In Hollywood, it was reported that tv actor Roger Smith, of the "77 Sunset Strip" series, had undergone surgery on Wednesday for removal of a blood clot, after suffering a concussion earlier in the month in a fall at his home.
On the editorial page, "Charlotte Needs a Sense of Urgency" indicates that it was now or never for a single, coordinated public school system for Charlotte and Mecklenburg County, as viewed by the experts who had studied voting behavior on such issues elsewhere.
It finds it a harsh and gloomy judgment, but if it would shock good citizens into an awareness of the responsibility at the upcoming vote on Tuesday on the bond issue which effectively would permit consolidation, then it might have value. It suggests that it would be difficult for the advocates of equal educational opportunities to recover from any serious defeat of the bond and that it was doubtful that a new attempt could even get off the ground before serious damage would be done to both school systems, by which point, each would be divided from the other by considerable built-in bitterness.
It indicates that the great virtue of consolidation at present was that it would be the proverbial stitch in time heading off decay. It would prevent the fiscal problems caused by two separate systems operating in essentially the same metropolitan community and would assure uniformly high standards of instruction for all children with maximum efficiency and ease. The people of the community could not afford to gamble with the future of their children. Consolidation was an economic and educational necessity and it urges that voters had to be made to realize that fact before going to the polls the following week.
It indicates that on the pages of the newspaper, both news and editorials, it had attempted to focus attention on many aspects of the complex issue and would continue to do so between the present and Tuesday, but unfortunately, a healthy interest in the issue had not been noted. It suggests that perhaps most minds had already been made up, but some, it fears, had been made up on the basis of claptrap, rumors and red herrings. There were always those who opposed any change on the ground that what was good enough for earlier generations was good enough for the present one, when, actually, consolidation was an attempt to conserve the best that was in each system by saving both from decay. The opportunity was at hand and it urges that it must not be muffed.
Neither Charlotte nor Mecklenburg County could afford to allow duplications, inequities and quarrels over possession of the perimeter area to weaken the type of education it provided the children of the community and hopes a sense of urgency about the critical issue would be developed before the polls would open on Tuesday. "It would be tragic in the extreme if years of work and the best judgment of the county's most thoughtful civic leaders went for naught merely because citizens failed to feel this urgency and react accordingly."
"Fire Traps: The Law Is Too Generous" indicates that Charlotte's Rescue Mission had 30 days to begin making corrections in a building labeled a "fire trap" the previous day by building inspectors, finding that it was 29 days too long.
It indicates that the plight of the Mission's staff was regrettable as available funding was limited, but that it was not nearly as regrettable as the plight of 170 sleeping transients should a fire break out at night in the ancient structure. A building inspector had told the newspaper that a nocturnal blaze could mean the loss of many lives. It finds that if that were the case, it was hardly reasonable for the law to allow so much leeway in correcting the deficiencies. If the building was in fact a "heckuva mess", as the building inspector had said, the test of good intent in meeting minimum standards of safety ought be applied quickly and to allow a month of grace was actually too generous.
It concludes that it took only minutes for flames to sweep through the Atlanta hotel a few years earlier, with a death toll of 119.
"Life in (Average) America" quotes from a letter to the New York Post: "I can't make head or tail out of what's going on in Geneva or Washington or London, but the tragic and moving story of Gloria Vanderbilt's struggle to keep her children for herself and away from that ancient musician is something the average person can feel and understand."
It responds: "Look at it this way, ma'm: Uncle Sam is just trying to keep his kids out of the clutches of those lousy Russians."
The "ancient musician", was her second husband, Leopold Stokowski. Anderson Cooper of CNN and until recently, of "60 Minutes" on CBS, was one of Ms. Vanderbilt's later children, in 1967.
"Democrats Should Listen to Lyndon" indicates that as the Senate Majority Leader Lyndon Johnson had prepared a rush schedule for the money bills on the eve of the new fiscal year, he had wisely warned the "frisky liberals in his little Democratic army that discretion remains the better part of valor—even though Democrats outnumber the GOP."
The liberals were angry because Senator Johnson wanted to bow to the President's threat of vetoes by "watering down" pending legislation. He reminded the Democratic left that the public had elected legislators to legislate and not to gain leverage for future elections. He said, "If we have to choose between a political issue and achievement, we are going to choose achievement." In fact, his way to both goals, achievement and political leverage, appeared best.
Republicans wanted nothing better than to see the huge Democratic Congressional majority waste its time in vain sulking over the President's veto threats, lending substance to their taunts that Senator Johnson was leading a "won't do" Congress—a takeoff on the 1948 castigation of Congress by then-President Truman as a "do-nothing" Congress.
It finds Senator Johnson wise to ignore the "friskies of the Democratic left wing", like Senators William Proxmire of Wisconsin and Joseph Clark of Pennsylvania, who thought that Democrats would gain votes by disdaining the President's anti-inflation pleas and sending him legislation the free-style "spending" of which would force him to resort to the veto. The liberal Senators had failed, it appeared, to calculate the deep emotional complexes which the President had tapped with his onslaught against "spending" and deficits. That complicated issue lent itself to black-and-white caricature, and the fearsome bugaboo of an inflation-ruined country would not be put down merely by talk of the nation's needs.
It suggests that perhaps the only hope of the liberal Democrats was to recast the argument over "spending" slowly, to show that in surplus budgets and tight money, there would potentially be danger of economic stagnation. But that would take time and ingenuity and it finds that Senator Johnson was correct in saying that it would not be done in a day by forcing bills on the President which cried out for vetoes.
"Pidgin Rock" indicates that Mario Pei, a linguist, had related as an example of Pidgin English the reaction of a Solomon Islands chieftain during a visit to New York: "Me look um big fellow place. He high up too much. He alla same one fella mountain."
It concludes: "Add bass, guitar and drums and we have a new rock 'n' roll lyric."
A piece from the Florida Times-Union, titled "Hup, Two, Three, Four", finds it disquieting to learn that the Army had reached the stage of militarization at which it was considering standardization of buttons and buttonholes, as Assistant Secretary of the Army Courtney Johnson had told a House committee that the Army hoped to save the taxpayers money by making all buttonholes the same size.
It begs to disagree if the reader regarded it as a minor point, finding it a major point which showed the vast difference between the military way and the American way. "There is nothing that quickens the heartbeat of a man with a military mind so much as uniformity. The sight of large groups of soldiers doing the same acts together, whether marching or shooting, has brought tears into many a general's eyes."
It finds it fortunate that the country was a land of 175 million different individuals doing different things at different times. "We are a nation of all kinds of buttonholes, big and little, new and old, fine and tattered."
It indicates that the country was founded on the idea that a free society required "all kinds of buttonholes, big buttons and buttonholes for certain jobs and tiny ones for other tasks." But the Army was now refuting that idea by ordering all buttonholes to be the same size.
It suggests that even the argument for efficiency was begging the question, as there would be a waste of button power in replacing small buttons, like those on the cuff, with one standard size which would have to be large enough to hold a fat soldier's bulges. "The next time you see a standardized soldier in standardized uniform with standardized buttonholes think of the possibility of a standardized America."
Drew Pearson indicates that actor
Hugh O'Brian, who starred as Wyatt Earp
Only the insiders realized it, but the President could have saved himself a lot of headaches over the confirmation fight of Admiral Lewis Strauss if he had carried out his promise to Undersecretary of Commerce Walter Williams, who had served for five years under Secretary of Commerce Sinclair Weeks with the explicit understanding that he would replace Mr. Weeks when the latter returned to Boston. Mr. Williams had been the chief organizer of the Citizens-for-Eisenhower clubs and had served as their national chairman during the 1952 campaign, helping to raise the 2 million dollars to blanket the television networks with the famous spot appearances of General Eisenhower during the last two weeks of that campaign. After the General had won, Mr. Williams was made Undersecretary of Commerce with the understanding that he would be promoted to the Cabinet later. Mr. Williams was a progressive businessman from Seattle and an early organizer of the Committee for Economic Development, believed that small business had to be supported to retain the principle of free competition. Though he had not been happy with the policies of Mr. Weeks regarding business, he had remained in the Commerce Department, awaiting his resignation. Finally, when that occurred, the President reversed himself after former Secretary of the Treasury George Humphrey had persuaded him to appoint his friend, Admiral Strauss, partner in one of the biggest Wall Street investment firms. Tired of waiting and fed up with big business policies, Mr. Williams had resigned.
Jim Scotton, former police reporter for The News, now in Paris with his wife, also a journalist, after he had completed a year of study at the Sorbonne, indicates that a new word had been added to the "Verity and Severity" slogan of Premier Charles de Gaulle in his effort to rebuild France, that being "Sobriety", as the Government had initiated a campaign to curb the average Frenchman's thirst for cider, beer, and brandy, and above all, wine.
The Government had tried to increase wine taxes heavily, had initiated educational campaigns and passed stricter laws to control the country's 433,000 café operators and officially uncounted bootleggers. The powerful wine industry, however, had raised protests and a delegation had angrily visited the Premier after French schoolchildren had brought home blotters carrying anti-alcohol slogans. The Premier had refused the delegation's demand that he reiterate that wine was the French national drink.
The National Committee for the Defense against Alcoholism, partially supported by the Government, had stated that one Frenchman in 25, close to 2 million, was an alcoholic and that the systems of another 2 million had been impregnated with alcohol through years of steady, heavy wine drinking, that deaths from alcoholism had gone up 1,000 percent between 1946 and 1956, that cirrhosis of the liver had risen by 400 percent, and that two medical groups had reported that large numbers of children, 30 percent in one heavy drinking Normandy area, had been born retarded because of alcoholic parents.
The French spent 10 percent of their income on alcohol, most of it going for "vin rouge ordinaire" at mealtimes, three times the expenditure rate by Americans for alcohol. The combination of heavy spending and cheap wine, with table wine costing less than a quarter per bottle, gave France the highest per capita consumption of alcohol in the world, 3 to 4 times that of the U.S. The two latest surveys had reported that annual alcohol consumption added up to between 133 and 154 quarts of wine for each French man, woman and child. Various surveys had shown that alcohol was retarding French youth, killing French motorists and hampering French productive activity through industrial accidents.
The anti-alcohol campaign contended that one reason the French drank so much was that too much wine and brandy was available, with wine production averaging 16 percent over consumption in both 1955 and 1956. The Government had bought up the surplus, just as in the U.S. the Government bought up surplus cotton or corn. Bad weather had cut production below consumption during the previous two years, but during the current year, something else could reduce production. The report was that the Government would not buy any more surplus wine.
One reason why brandy was available so cheaply, especially in rural areas, was that French law permitted each farmer to distill alcohol for "family use". In theory, the farmer had to grow the fruit he turned into alcohol, but in fact, any French farmer who wanted to make his own "eau de vie" or strong common, sometimes overpowering, brandy, could do so.
In two dozen French departments, there was a still for every two adult men.
Former Premier Pierre Mendes-France, who had vainly sought to switch the French from wine to milk, had gotten a law passed in 1954 limiting the distilling privilege to farmers who actually grew their fruit. But the National Assembly had kept postponing the enforcement date and three years earlier, there were 3.6 million farmyard stills in the country, although the number had dropped considerably since. Some of those stills obviously operated for more than "family use". A report to the French Council of State a few weeks earlier had estimated that illegal alcohol sales reached 150 million dollars per year. In some areas, bootleggers operated their own tank trucks in broad daylight and forced café owners to refuse to purchase legal, tax-paid alcohol. And two years earlier, French police had caught one group supplying 288 cafés in the Paris area.
Reports indicated that the Government would start enforcing the Mendes-France law in the ensuing September. Real enforcement would be an enormous help in rural areas where alcoholism contributed directly to 50 percent of the deaths. So much wine and brandy was available so cheaply that the rural Frenchman in particular accepted heavy drinking as a part of his way of life. The situation also kept thousands of small cafés in business. One French community of 3,000, for example, had five bakeries, six butchers and 28 cafés.
Even with his enormous popularity, Premier De Gaulle had to move slowly, as the wine industry employed 8 percent of the workforce, and was thus a powerful voice in voting. Also, despite anti-alcohol posters blossoming during the spring in Paris, in the rest of the nation, the average Frenchman considered alcoholism and wine entirely unrelated. A survey in Haut-Rhin, the area which had the second highest cirrhosis of the liver death rate in the country, had revealed that half of the population believed that wine was nourishing and had curative powers.
Most anti-alcohol workers believed
that it would be 10 to 15 years before they could make any changes in
the French drinking habits, but they were hopeful. France did not
have the enormous problem of youthful alcoholics found in Communist
countries, they had pointed out, and the Government had come a long
way, they added, since the days when it had subsidized such slogans
as "A meal without wine
A letter writer from Gaffney, S.C., indicates that the four Florida youths, ranging in age between 16 and 23, who had been convicted by an all-white male jury of raping a black freshman coed, 19, of Florida A&M University, and had then been sentenced to life imprisonment, had committed a "despicable crime and got only what they deserved; neither I nor any other thinking Southerner can argue with the decision." But he finds a footnote or something which deserved mention as perhaps an anti-climax, as the Florida case had been given the "full treatment on the front pages of just about every newspaper in the country." He points out that on page 5 of the June 19 News, there had been a terse item headlined, "Youth Attacks N.Y. Schoolgirl". He parenthetically points out that it was not on the front page. He says that a 14-year old white schoolgirl was reported therein to have been assaulted by a black male in a schoolyard while five other black males circled around her. He suggests that the five circling blacks were probably well-bred Christian youngsters, and that the piece had stated that they had "molested but did not attack her." The girl was reported to be in fair condition in the hospital. He wonders why that story was not given the front-page spread as had the Florida case, given that the crimes were basically the same, and, given the younger age of the white girl in New York, he finds that it was even worse. "Have Negro attacks on white women become so commonplace that they deserve mention only on page 5? At this rate how long will it be before white women will be in danger even in broad daylight on main streets? When, may I ask, does it end?" He says that according to "certain nitwit newspaper writers (not in The News, I am happy to say) the entire South was on trial in Florida. Will the North be on trial when the schoolgirl's Negro attackers are hailed into court? Or will they be released to try again? Either way, I'm betting the case isn't mentioned again. The anti-South factions in the North will see to that." He wonders what would happen to the laws if the wife or daughter of a U.S. Supreme Court Justice were to fall victim to the same type of "sub-human" attack which the New York schoolgirl had undergone. He suggests that it might take something like that to wake them up.
He might pause and take a breath and realize that the history of racism in the South, coupled with the history of slavery until the end of the Civil War and the 13th Amendment, and given the minority status of blacks in the country, plus the all-white jury in Florida, had made that case a focal point on the belief by many that the verdict would have been not guilty. Thus, the case stood out. Obviously, no one would have excused the behavior in New York either and to suggest that the perpetrators of that crime, if guilty, would be released is merely to engage in projection and cynicism, not fact. Such projections breed defensiveness of the type which the letter writer presents, even while stating properly that the crime in Florida had been one which was horrible.
He could not know, of course, that the convicted gang-rapists in the Florida case would each be paroled by 1967, though two of them would return to prison for parole violations, one for several years. Only the youngest would remain free from further criminal conduct, while one had allegedly murdered a black woman subsequently, telling the youngest while in prison that he would commit such a murder as vengeance for his conviction in 1959, eventually acquitted of that murder after his original conviction was overturned on appeal, though serving several more years of his life sentence for a parole violation on the 1959 case for evading arrest in the later murder case.
We have, incidentally, been unable to locate the referenced piece in The News, as it does not appear on page 5 of the only edition of the newspaper available for June 19 or on June 20. Regardless, the letter writer should have done a little further research across the state's newspapers, as it did appear the following day on the front page of the Greensboro Record. Ditto, albeit in brief, on the front page of the Rock Hill, S.C., Evening Herald. Many Northern newspapers, meanwhile, also gave the story only inside-page treatment. Eventually, as reported November 18, the four youths, ranging in age from 16 to 18, plus different facts having beeen adduced related to the victim's admitted behavior, thus not "basically the same" as the Florida case for purposes of sentencing and culpability under the law generally, faced at most 20 years in prison under New York law for rape—not life or potentially death, as under Florida's Draconian sentencing laws, bloated in length for public consumption at the time, leaving to the often-politicized parole board the ultimate discretion on release and, not incidentally, the ability to discriminate on virtually any basis, racial or otherwise—, and instead pleaded guilty to the lesser included offense of assault with intent to commit rape, subjecting each to at most an indeterminate term of up to five years in a juvenile facility.
Parenthetical note to Jack: You'd better wash that hand thoroughly after that handshake in Chicago, as you've no idea where it might have been.
A letter writer indicates that in another 30 years or so, there would be letters to the editor about how all of the juveniles were delinquent because they did not have the old-fashioned chores around home anymore, such as turning up the thermostat every morning or pushing the button to open the garage door.
He left out the new RCA tv remote controls. One of our fellow students during the ensuing year would bring one of those gadgets to class to show it off to all of his credulous colleagues, contending that with the flick of a button, he could turn on his television set at home, probably a half-mile or more from the school. Some of the students listening to his story wanted to know what program was on at home. We hoped that he would not, given the prevalence of Western Electric schoolchildren in the community, where they designed and manufactured the missile guidance systems, get hold of another type of remote control device.
![]()
![]()
![]()